Editorial policy

Editorial standards

Every product claim published on edutris.com must trace to a verified capability inventory maintained against the actual codebase. If a capability is not verified, it is not claimed — anywhere: pages, blog posts, comparisons or metadata.

Features we are building but have not shipped appear only on the public roadmap, labelled "Coming next" or "Exploring" — never in present-tense marketing copy. When something ships, the changelog records it with a real date.

We do not publish fabricated testimonials, customer counts, ratings, awards, certifications or partnerships. If you ever find one, it is a bug — tell us and we will remove it.

Review & comparison policy

Our comparison pages (Edutris vs other school software) are written to be genuinely useful to a school choosing software — including stating plainly where a competitor is stronger or where Edutris loses. No comparison is pay-to-play, and we do not accept payment for placement in any list we publish.

Competitor information is drawn from public materials (websites, pricing pages, documentation) at the time of writing. Products change; if we have something wrong or outdated, email us and we will correct it.

Research methodology

Our calculators implement official public formulas and norms — for example the CBSE nine-point grading bands, the CGPA ×9.5 indicative conversion, RTE pupil–teacher ratio norms and NEP 2020 age mapping. They compute; they do not estimate from hidden assumptions.

Guides on compliance topics (UDISE+, APAAR, NEP 2020, RTE, DPDP, board affiliation) are based on public government and board documentation, framed for school operators, and explicitly note that state-specific rules vary and should be confirmed with the relevant authority. They are practical guidance, not legal advice.

When we cite numbers about Indian education, we cite public sources. We do not invent statistics.

Content governance

Content on this site is written and reviewed by the Edutris team, led by founder Manjunath Shedabal, who builds the product this site describes. That closeness is deliberate: the people writing about the product are the people building it.

We use AI assistance in drafting content — the same philosophy as the product itself: AI drafts, a human reviews, edits and approves before anything is published. Responsibility for every published claim rests with us, not with a tool.

Corrections: if we learn something we published is wrong, we fix the page. For material errors we note the correction in the changelog. Reach us at the contact page — a real person reads it, Mon–Fri, 9–6 IST.